AI Ready? Google Ads Maturity Model.
11 hours ago
Friday, October 31, 2008
Saturday, September 27, 2008
High School Musical - Me Version!
I have been a huge fan of JibJab for the past 5 years, since the first day I saw their rendition on “Arnold for Governor”. But today, today is an emotional moment for me. Having long been a closet High School Musical Fan hiding in the shadows, ashamed of my connection. The time has come to expose myself to the world! To step out of that closet and to be the man I know I can be! Thanks to JibJab and their wicked digital technology I can now dance with the stars. God, I love the Internet!
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Politics, Politicians and Digital Marketing
I absolutely love how the Internet has completely changed the dynamic of the political landscape in world. Thanks to online social media tools, politicians now have a new battle ground for throwing hand grenades at each other. As little as 5 years ago they would have used network television, newsprint and newscasts to fire their rocket launchers at their political adversaries. Now all they have to do is get a movie star like say, Matt Damon to record a two-minute video completely undressing their opponent and BOOM, over 1.5 million people are influenced and engaged within 2 days. It seems in order to win an election today's politician has to be a good public speaker (capable of bullshitting large crowds), a credibility assassin (capable of discrediting his competition) and a digital marketing guru (capable of building online brand with connections in Hollywood). What the hell happen to leadership, ethics and morality?
Sorry, I forgot for a moment that I was talking about politicians. Those words are not top of mind when you discuss our political “leaders”. Why is that? Why do the majority of voters look at the people who run our world as evil, manipulators who conspire to steal our tax dollars? Creditability and trust is obviously a big issue for politicians. Having these two virtues is no doubt the determining factor between winning and losing; hence, why so many candidates have turned to the Internet to build their personal brand online. They want people to get to know the person and the opponent at every level.
Politicians once depended on the physical presence and pole data to gauge their personal brand with constituents. Now they can crawl the web for blog posts, news items, comments and video content measuring opinions and looking for weakness in their opponent’s armor. They hire companies to drill down through all the layers of information online and provide insight. They wage war on one another with captivating online posts that generate immeasurable amounts of "Water Cooler" talk. As a result any close political race today is really undecided until the final bell or shoot across the bow. Unlike the days when candidates had to stop campaigning days before the vote, today they influence opinion right up until the “X” is marked on the ballot. It makes you wonder what hot and juicy tidbits Ohbama and Maclean have in their war chests set aside for the week prior to the vote when they load their Flame Throwers and burn one another.
With the power of digital marketing and the ruthless nature of politics today it amazing that we still have anyone interested in running for office. How many of us could stand the personal attacks and character assassinations that take place in the media. With this new digital battlefield the war seems to have intensified. Voting has become a measurement of who you dislike the least as opposed to who has the leadership skills. So I think I’ll wait until the night before Election Day to make my decision on whom to vote for in our upcoming federal election. I’ll go online, summarize all the news on each candidate, assign a rating using my “Bullshitometer” and glance at their election platform (not like they’re going to stick with it) then decide who best weathered the mine field of rhetoric. Thank God we have the Internet!
Sorry, I forgot for a moment that I was talking about politicians. Those words are not top of mind when you discuss our political “leaders”. Why is that? Why do the majority of voters look at the people who run our world as evil, manipulators who conspire to steal our tax dollars? Creditability and trust is obviously a big issue for politicians. Having these two virtues is no doubt the determining factor between winning and losing; hence, why so many candidates have turned to the Internet to build their personal brand online. They want people to get to know the person and the opponent at every level.
Politicians once depended on the physical presence and pole data to gauge their personal brand with constituents. Now they can crawl the web for blog posts, news items, comments and video content measuring opinions and looking for weakness in their opponent’s armor. They hire companies to drill down through all the layers of information online and provide insight. They wage war on one another with captivating online posts that generate immeasurable amounts of "Water Cooler" talk. As a result any close political race today is really undecided until the final bell or shoot across the bow. Unlike the days when candidates had to stop campaigning days before the vote, today they influence opinion right up until the “X” is marked on the ballot. It makes you wonder what hot and juicy tidbits Ohbama and Maclean have in their war chests set aside for the week prior to the vote when they load their Flame Throwers and burn one another.
With the power of digital marketing and the ruthless nature of politics today it amazing that we still have anyone interested in running for office. How many of us could stand the personal attacks and character assassinations that take place in the media. With this new digital battlefield the war seems to have intensified. Voting has become a measurement of who you dislike the least as opposed to who has the leadership skills. So I think I’ll wait until the night before Election Day to make my decision on whom to vote for in our upcoming federal election. I’ll go online, summarize all the news on each candidate, assign a rating using my “Bullshitometer” and glance at their election platform (not like they’re going to stick with it) then decide who best weathered the mine field of rhetoric. Thank God we have the Internet!
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Collaboration
I recently had the opportunity to go back and re-read a favorite book of mine call Wikinomics by Don Tapscott and Anthony Williams. It was re-release in 2008 so it seemed like a good opportunity to rejuvenate my mind on the topic of collaborative thinking. Tapscott and Williams do a great job of demonstrating how traditional business models are under attack by growing collaborative structures that leverage open sharing of information. They believe that the future for all business is a global model that involves open sharing of intellectual properties (IP) with the goal of increasing innovation. What made the read more interesting this time around is I could compare the book's 2006 predictions to 2008 realities. It's amazing how well they called it.
Tapscott and Williams discussed the Apple iPod and sighted how Apple was under attack by a small group of enthusiastic programmers who want to hack their product. They discussed how a traditional approach to manipulation of a product would be to fire off a lawsuit and shutdown the offenders much like the music industry has done with illegal downloads. In 2006 Apple didn’t know how they were going to deal with this issue. In 2008 we see their response in the iPhone and iTouch products.
Apple looked at the effects of taking a defensive stance on iPod abuse and instead of launching a war with their customers and enthusiasts they decided to collaborate with them and build a better product. Apple looked at the music industry and saw how companies like Sony are alienating their customers. Sony’s defensive position on music and downloads has put them at odds and in some case in court with the people who buy their products. Apple realized it had to find a better way to meet its customer’s demands and create a revenue opportunity. They had to innovate.
Rapid innovation is no easy task. Traditionally it involves a team of company engineers who brainstorm, invent, develop, test market, re-work and launch new products. It can be a lengthy process spanning years and costing millions of dollars. Given today’s rapidly changing global playing field, it’s extremely risky to invest “the farm” in R & D. Today smart companies are doing their homework by asking their customers what they want before they build it. They're listening and learning before they invest. Apple did this when they embarked on the re-design of the iPod and the development of the iPhone. What they heard completely changed the product, challenged the business model and ultimately lead to one the biggest innovations in the history of the company.
Apple created hackable devices. They didn’t go out there and broadcast it, but you can bet they intended to have it happen. Apple realized in 2006 that their enthusiasts, their market influencers, want a piece of hardware they could customize. They were already doing it so it was quite obvious where the new device's development had to go. Apple used a collaborative approach to developing these products. They listen to their customer and found a way to give them what they wanted without bankrupting the iPod division. They could have very easily locked down their device and issued cease and desist letters to their customers. Instead Apple developed a software operating system for handhelds that allowed their customers to write their own apps.
As a result the market has exploded with innovative new tools for the iPhone and iTouch. Apple’s R & D for iApps has become a revenue generator as opposed to an expense. They now have a global network of millions of software engineers who can respond to their customer’s demands for iApps 100 times faster than a group of Apple engineers. Apple simply shares the revenues with the developers and approves their products. The new collaborative model has lead to a windfall for Apple who just announce $3o million in revenue in the last 30 days from iApps and is projecting a gross revenue of over $325 million on the year.
Apple leveraged the collaborative approach by sharing some of their IP with their customers in order to gain the knowledge they knew existed in the iPod community. By sharing their technology they have built a massive new R & D department that doesn't require parking space at head office. This group develops applications because they can and because they want to, not because they're being paid for it. People love their iPhone and iTouch. Christ, I love my iTouch and 3 years ago if you had of asked me about Apple I would have told you it was junk – pretty package with nothing inside! Today I see them as one of the most innovative companies on the planet.
You have to wonder if Steve Jobs didn’t read Wikinomics in 2006 because the direction Apple took parallels perfectly with the Tapscott and Williams model. I think I’ll give Jobs a ring and ask him!
Tapscott and Williams discussed the Apple iPod and sighted how Apple was under attack by a small group of enthusiastic programmers who want to hack their product. They discussed how a traditional approach to manipulation of a product would be to fire off a lawsuit and shutdown the offenders much like the music industry has done with illegal downloads. In 2006 Apple didn’t know how they were going to deal with this issue. In 2008 we see their response in the iPhone and iTouch products.
Apple looked at the effects of taking a defensive stance on iPod abuse and instead of launching a war with their customers and enthusiasts they decided to collaborate with them and build a better product. Apple looked at the music industry and saw how companies like Sony are alienating their customers. Sony’s defensive position on music and downloads has put them at odds and in some case in court with the people who buy their products. Apple realized it had to find a better way to meet its customer’s demands and create a revenue opportunity. They had to innovate.
Rapid innovation is no easy task. Traditionally it involves a team of company engineers who brainstorm, invent, develop, test market, re-work and launch new products. It can be a lengthy process spanning years and costing millions of dollars. Given today’s rapidly changing global playing field, it’s extremely risky to invest “the farm” in R & D. Today smart companies are doing their homework by asking their customers what they want before they build it. They're listening and learning before they invest. Apple did this when they embarked on the re-design of the iPod and the development of the iPhone. What they heard completely changed the product, challenged the business model and ultimately lead to one the biggest innovations in the history of the company.
Apple created hackable devices. They didn’t go out there and broadcast it, but you can bet they intended to have it happen. Apple realized in 2006 that their enthusiasts, their market influencers, want a piece of hardware they could customize. They were already doing it so it was quite obvious where the new device's development had to go. Apple used a collaborative approach to developing these products. They listen to their customer and found a way to give them what they wanted without bankrupting the iPod division. They could have very easily locked down their device and issued cease and desist letters to their customers. Instead Apple developed a software operating system for handhelds that allowed their customers to write their own apps.
As a result the market has exploded with innovative new tools for the iPhone and iTouch. Apple’s R & D for iApps has become a revenue generator as opposed to an expense. They now have a global network of millions of software engineers who can respond to their customer’s demands for iApps 100 times faster than a group of Apple engineers. Apple simply shares the revenues with the developers and approves their products. The new collaborative model has lead to a windfall for Apple who just announce $3o million in revenue in the last 30 days from iApps and is projecting a gross revenue of over $325 million on the year.
Apple leveraged the collaborative approach by sharing some of their IP with their customers in order to gain the knowledge they knew existed in the iPod community. By sharing their technology they have built a massive new R & D department that doesn't require parking space at head office. This group develops applications because they can and because they want to, not because they're being paid for it. People love their iPhone and iTouch. Christ, I love my iTouch and 3 years ago if you had of asked me about Apple I would have told you it was junk – pretty package with nothing inside! Today I see them as one of the most innovative companies on the planet.
You have to wonder if Steve Jobs didn’t read Wikinomics in 2006 because the direction Apple took parallels perfectly with the Tapscott and Williams model. I think I’ll give Jobs a ring and ask him!
Saturday, July 26, 2008
Softball Bat Marketing
First off, this entry has nothing to do with digital marketing, just a note on marketing in general. About 20 years ago I had the opportunity to work for a company by the name of Hillerich & Bradsby (H&B) out of Louisville, Kentucky. H&B is a family owned business that has roots tracing back to the late 1800s. One the company's core product offerings is the baseball bat brand Louisville Slugger. In 1989 when I worked with H & B baseball products they were experiencing a real down turn in the bat business. Young players were realizing a number of other sporting opportunities and as a result registration growth in the sport had begun to stabilize and decline. As a leading supplier to this market, H&B was faced with the challenge of increasing their market share and growing their sales in a period of declining demand. Enter the marketing guys.
When people get tired of a product or a customer base declines a common strategy is to get the consumer to upgrade. Give them a reason to buy a new bat. The first place H & B turned was to their research and development team to give them a competitive edge. They had their engineers scope out a space age material used by NASA in space shuttle fuselage that would help them make high performance bats. Using CU31 alloy, a new bread of high-end bat was created and branded the Louisville Slugger Tournament Pro Series (TPS). The new bat was made from an ultralight weight alloy that supposedly gave the batter a new level of hitting power. No one else had this technology so H&B could charge a premium for their product. They introduce one of the first +$100.00 bat products supporting it with a massive marketing initiative targeted at building brand awareness for TPS.
Speed a head to 2008, the average softball bat is now selling for between $250 and $400 dollars. Those who can't afford the price tag are buying used bats on eBay. Twenty years ago retailers laughed when I told them they should be selling +$100 softball bats. The market didn't understand the value proposition. Today, thanks to a genius marketing strategy, players now feel they need them. What the hell happened?
As volume dropped H & B realized they had to bring the average cost per item up in order to grow bat sales. They saw an opportunity to bring the bat up market by introduce new technology and changing customer perception. They also knew how serious some of the recreational players were about their game and felt that these players would pay a lot more money for a product that would make the ball go further. How much more was the only unknown variable. Over the past twenty years H & B has continually innovated and marketed to this target audience while steadily edging the average cost of the product upwards constantly testing the consumer's price threshold.
Today most players expects to pay $300 for a bat in order to get the edge they need. But here's the interesting thing, the ball diamonds haven't gotten any bigger and the last time I attended a softball game(about 2 weeks ago) I don't remember seeing any home run records set by people using the +$300 bat. Just another proof point for the power of good marketing. If done with great insight marketing can completely change perception. Pretty demand amazing how H & B managed to convince their customers that an aluminum bat is actually worth 300% more in 2008 than it was in 1989.
When people get tired of a product or a customer base declines a common strategy is to get the consumer to upgrade. Give them a reason to buy a new bat. The first place H & B turned was to their research and development team to give them a competitive edge. They had their engineers scope out a space age material used by NASA in space shuttle fuselage that would help them make high performance bats. Using CU31 alloy, a new bread of high-end bat was created and branded the Louisville Slugger Tournament Pro Series (TPS). The new bat was made from an ultralight weight alloy that supposedly gave the batter a new level of hitting power. No one else had this technology so H&B could charge a premium for their product. They introduce one of the first +$100.00 bat products supporting it with a massive marketing initiative targeted at building brand awareness for TPS.
Speed a head to 2008, the average softball bat is now selling for between $250 and $400 dollars. Those who can't afford the price tag are buying used bats on eBay. Twenty years ago retailers laughed when I told them they should be selling +$100 softball bats. The market didn't understand the value proposition. Today, thanks to a genius marketing strategy, players now feel they need them. What the hell happened?
As volume dropped H & B realized they had to bring the average cost per item up in order to grow bat sales. They saw an opportunity to bring the bat up market by introduce new technology and changing customer perception. They also knew how serious some of the recreational players were about their game and felt that these players would pay a lot more money for a product that would make the ball go further. How much more was the only unknown variable. Over the past twenty years H & B has continually innovated and marketed to this target audience while steadily edging the average cost of the product upwards constantly testing the consumer's price threshold.
Today most players expects to pay $300 for a bat in order to get the edge they need. But here's the interesting thing, the ball diamonds haven't gotten any bigger and the last time I attended a softball game(about 2 weeks ago) I don't remember seeing any home run records set by people using the +$300 bat. Just another proof point for the power of good marketing. If done with great insight marketing can completely change perception. Pretty demand amazing how H & B managed to convince their customers that an aluminum bat is actually worth 300% more in 2008 than it was in 1989.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Olympics go Social
Where better to use Social Media then as part of an Olympic Games marketing campaign. Lenovo, a Worldwide supplier of innovation, is sponsoring a site that allows followers to get an inside perspective on athletes from around the world. Voices of the Olympic Games is a aggregation of blogs with a sorting tool that allows you to quickly and easily sift through the thousands of blog entries be post by hundreds of athletes. Lenovo partnered with Google to create this incredibly real approach to covering the Olympics. The site adheres to the best practices outlined by the Word of Mouth Marketing Association. None of the athletes are required to mention anything about Lenovo. There is no editorial management of the site's content. It's just real content from real athletes who share their thoughts with the rest of the world!
To compliment the blogging, Lenovo created Facebook applications for each country. Users can add the application to their profiles and view the blog posts through the Facebook interface. The application leverages the viral aptitude of Facebook by encourage participants to invite their friends to become fans of the user's country rewarding the user for the number of referrals they generate. It displays a summary view of how many fans there are for each country encouraging the user to invite more friends to elevate their favorite country's ranking . Over 100,000 Facebookites have downloaded the application.
So why do it? Why would Lenovo invest millions of dollars in this initiative? They see the value of connecting their brand to an incredibly powerful information source that will get worldwide exposure. They know that the site will have an extremely high rate of visitor recurrence. They know that it will get passed around to other enthusiasts. They're looking to create online brand awareness and its working because until now I had no idea who they were or what they did.
To compliment the blogging, Lenovo created Facebook applications for each country. Users can add the application to their profiles and view the blog posts through the Facebook interface. The application leverages the viral aptitude of Facebook by encourage participants to invite their friends to become fans of the user's country rewarding the user for the number of referrals they generate. It displays a summary view of how many fans there are for each country encouraging the user to invite more friends to elevate their favorite country's ranking . Over 100,000 Facebookites have downloaded the application.
So why do it? Why would Lenovo invest millions of dollars in this initiative? They see the value of connecting their brand to an incredibly powerful information source that will get worldwide exposure. They know that the site will have an extremely high rate of visitor recurrence. They know that it will get passed around to other enthusiasts. They're looking to create online brand awareness and its working because until now I had no idea who they were or what they did.
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
Serch Engine Optimization Tips
Search engine optimization is becoming very important as more and more people load terabytes of data online. Massive amounts of text, video and photos are being uploaded everyday. I new culture of information sharing is evolving and with it comes a massive spike in the amount of data loaded on the web. As the amount grows it becomes exceedingly important to optimize content for search engines. Unfortunately, the big search engines don’t make this easy with their secret search algorithms. Optimization becomes more of a guessing game with perpetual iterations of change. That said, there are numerous books and opinions on how to generate high rankings, but they're all based on opinion so here's mine.
First off and probably foremost, don’t try to be a hacker. Creating ghost pages on your site packed with keywords or posting hundreds of external links won’t help your cause. Today’s search engine crawlers are very intelligent and have a memory for methods targeted at circumventing the system. They will often demoted or delist a site if there is malicious activity so keep it real.
Focus on the content and how it is laid out. When you create your online presence define a group of descriptors that you feel represent what a searcher would enter if they were looking for your site. Remember that the more generic you are the more challenging it will be to differentiate yourself from the competition. There are many tools available to help you determine what people most often search. A great example of this is Google’s Keyword Tool. It allows the potential Adwords advertiser to get a snapshot of the competitive landscape for keywords. Users can look at individual words or phrases and determine how popular they are in search queries. Close review of these results can help to identify words that you could use in your content to help elevate search results.
When you write the content for your site make sure you pay close attention to the words used. Crawlers look for references that continually occur throughout a site. Make sure your keywords appear as often as possible. When possible use them in page titles. Make sure your page titles are not images, use header tags to ensure the search engine crawler can read the content.
Anchor tag or link text is also very important. The text inside of these tags should contain keywords as well. Avoid the generic “Click Here” line.
Keywords can also be placed in page URLs. With all the dynamic content on the web, URLs have become increasingly complex and quite often completely unrepresentative of their content. They often contain numbers and obscure character strings that mean nothing to a search engine. Where possible use clean URLs that contain keyword descriptions. For example, if you have page containing XYZ widgets the URL to the page should be www.example.com/XYZwidget/ as opposed to www.example.com/?id=41&content/43/32/67 .
Crawlers do just that, they crawl the web looking for content building huge indexes to help people find information. Links to and from your site form the roadway for Crawlers. Much like a spider web, the closer you are to the center the more pathways there are to your location. Since we want the Crawler to visit our site as frequently as possible it makes sense that there be as many pathways as possible. Internal and external linking is a very important part of SEO. Getting other sites to link to your site will help to increase Crawler traffic making it more visibility and elevating its ranking.
But visibility means nothing if a Crawler reaches your site and there isn’t anything new to index. Continually adding and updating your site forces Crawlers to constantly re-index its contents. Continue activity on a site helps to makes it look more popular in the eyes of the search engine. Blogs and other social media devices are great tools for organically growing a site’s content. The UGC created by these tools will also increases the number of internal and external links on the site.
Once you have optimized your site monitor its ranking and make adjustments. The job of optimizing a website for search engines is a perpetual effort. Use tools like Google’s Webmaster Package to see how people are finding your site. Webmaster provides a ranking review and will show you historical information for the past 6 months. When you look at the results watch closely for keywords that you haven’t considered in the past. If applicable incorporate them into the content.
Use analytics to review user patterns on the site. Note how your visitor’s use the site and see if there usage is related to the keywords you have selected. Are they finding the information you want them to find? If not try moving it around or re-writing it. Sometimes what you think is perfectly clear may mean something completely different to the visitor.
Finally, have a look at what your content looks like to a search engine to make sure it can see everything you want it to see. Turn off Javascript and style sheet functionality in your browser window and look at the content. Mozilla’s Firefox has a handy like tool set called Firebug that will allow you to turn off this functionality and see what a search engine sees when it visits your site. A well-built site should show a page of content nicely laid out much like a well-written book. Titles highlighted and content aligned in paragraph form.
So in my opinion organic search engine optimization is all about content. Using the right words in the right places and making sure they are visible to Crawlers is a must. Creating pathways to your site by using external links will help increase Crawler awareness while continually updating content will elevate popularity.
First off and probably foremost, don’t try to be a hacker. Creating ghost pages on your site packed with keywords or posting hundreds of external links won’t help your cause. Today’s search engine crawlers are very intelligent and have a memory for methods targeted at circumventing the system. They will often demoted or delist a site if there is malicious activity so keep it real.
Focus on the content and how it is laid out. When you create your online presence define a group of descriptors that you feel represent what a searcher would enter if they were looking for your site. Remember that the more generic you are the more challenging it will be to differentiate yourself from the competition. There are many tools available to help you determine what people most often search. A great example of this is Google’s Keyword Tool. It allows the potential Adwords advertiser to get a snapshot of the competitive landscape for keywords. Users can look at individual words or phrases and determine how popular they are in search queries. Close review of these results can help to identify words that you could use in your content to help elevate search results.
When you write the content for your site make sure you pay close attention to the words used. Crawlers look for references that continually occur throughout a site. Make sure your keywords appear as often as possible. When possible use them in page titles. Make sure your page titles are not images, use header tags to ensure the search engine crawler can read the content.
Anchor tag or link text is also very important. The text inside of these tags should contain keywords as well. Avoid the generic “Click Here” line.
Keywords can also be placed in page URLs. With all the dynamic content on the web, URLs have become increasingly complex and quite often completely unrepresentative of their content. They often contain numbers and obscure character strings that mean nothing to a search engine. Where possible use clean URLs that contain keyword descriptions. For example, if you have page containing XYZ widgets the URL to the page should be www.example.com/XYZwidget/ as opposed to www.example.com/?id=41&content/43/32/67 .
Crawlers do just that, they crawl the web looking for content building huge indexes to help people find information. Links to and from your site form the roadway for Crawlers. Much like a spider web, the closer you are to the center the more pathways there are to your location. Since we want the Crawler to visit our site as frequently as possible it makes sense that there be as many pathways as possible. Internal and external linking is a very important part of SEO. Getting other sites to link to your site will help to increase Crawler traffic making it more visibility and elevating its ranking.
But visibility means nothing if a Crawler reaches your site and there isn’t anything new to index. Continually adding and updating your site forces Crawlers to constantly re-index its contents. Continue activity on a site helps to makes it look more popular in the eyes of the search engine. Blogs and other social media devices are great tools for organically growing a site’s content. The UGC created by these tools will also increases the number of internal and external links on the site.
Once you have optimized your site monitor its ranking and make adjustments. The job of optimizing a website for search engines is a perpetual effort. Use tools like Google’s Webmaster Package to see how people are finding your site. Webmaster provides a ranking review and will show you historical information for the past 6 months. When you look at the results watch closely for keywords that you haven’t considered in the past. If applicable incorporate them into the content.
Use analytics to review user patterns on the site. Note how your visitor’s use the site and see if there usage is related to the keywords you have selected. Are they finding the information you want them to find? If not try moving it around or re-writing it. Sometimes what you think is perfectly clear may mean something completely different to the visitor.
Finally, have a look at what your content looks like to a search engine to make sure it can see everything you want it to see. Turn off Javascript and style sheet functionality in your browser window and look at the content. Mozilla’s Firefox has a handy like tool set called Firebug that will allow you to turn off this functionality and see what a search engine sees when it visits your site. A well-built site should show a page of content nicely laid out much like a well-written book. Titles highlighted and content aligned in paragraph form.
So in my opinion organic search engine optimization is all about content. Using the right words in the right places and making sure they are visible to Crawlers is a must. Creating pathways to your site by using external links will help increase Crawler awareness while continually updating content will elevate popularity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
